When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 3, 2018, at around 15:54, the Defendant, at the floor of the Cheongju-si, B, Cheongju-si, using the gaps in which surveillance of the victim D was neglected, was stolen by taking advantage of the gaps in surveillance of the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of damage from D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph explanation (such as a criminal scene, a photograph of the recovered damaged article);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that a defendant has been punished several times for the same or different crimes, and in particular, the execution of imprisonment has been terminated on March 9, 2018 and again committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, the possibility of criticism against the defendant is high.

However, the sentence as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances leading to the crime, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances before and after the crime, and the amount of damage is not so significant, and the defendant brought stolen objects to its original place after obtaining the victim's telephone, thereby returning them to the victim.