The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who operates an advertising company with the trade name “D” and around January 2016, from E, the vice president of the victim “B limited liability corporation,” the victim “B” around April 15, 2016.

4. 16. Whether it is possible to call a credit card F at a charity event held in China by the end of 16.

The proposal received money from the victim company and received money from the victim company and received the money.

In fact, the Defendant, even though he did not have been delegated by the private person affiliated with the above F (State)G with the authority of the F to contribute to the above charity, was delegated by the said company with the F’s authority other than his right to participate in the F’s exercise of the charity, forged the contract and sent it by e-mail as stated in the following 2-A, and as if the F would be present at the above charity, the Defendant made a false statement to E as if the F would be present at the above charity’s exercise, and then, on March 11, 2016, transferred the above bill (the sum equivalent to KRW 82,701,000,000, Chinese currency owned by the victim) to the account as a contribution fee from E.

As a result, the defendant by deceiving E, received property from the victim company.

2. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On March 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) prepared a “Woo F Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., in the H office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to delegate to the Defendant the Defendant, who is the vice-chairperson of the public corporation, who is not aware of the forgery, of I’s events (from April 15, 2016 to 16) of I’s event agency in the Chinese Gyeongsung F Co., Ltd., for the use of the computer at the H office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) prepared an “Woo G Co., Ltd., other than the Ssung F Co., Ltd., Ltd., for the use of the computer; and (c) forged the forgery by means of the e-mail on the 10th of the same month; and (d) sent it to the Defendant, a vice-chairperson of the public corporation, who is not aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights, obligations, or proof of facts, the Defendant forged and exercised another person's document.

B. On April 11, 2016, the Defendant committed a crime related to a self-contract on April 11, 2016.