beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.06.29 2016고단1695

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 20, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking without a license), driving B vehicles at a section of approximately 50 meters from the day front of the mutual singinginging line in Pyeongtaek-si and the front side of Pyeongtaek-si, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.081% in the blood, without obtaining a driver’s license on around 21:50 on September 20, 2014.

2. On September 20, 2014, the Defendant forged a private signature and signed the above investigation. On September 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) informed the police officer of personal information, such as the E’s name and resident registration number, etc., and (b) informed the police officer of personal information (PDA) of the personal information provided by the police officer, the Defendant signed the “E” in the driver’s signature box; and (c) transferred the same to the said police officer as if the Defendant was genuine.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged E’s signature for the purpose of exercising, and exercised the above forged E’s signature.

3. The Defendant forged a private document and carried out the aforementioned investigation document at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, and informed the police officer D of his personal information about E, and, at the lower right side of the driver’s circumstantial report stating the content of recognizing the result of drinking alcohol measurement, stated the same as “E on September 20, 2014” on the driver’s sexual name column below the lower right side of the driver’s sexual name report stating the content of recognizing the result of drinking alcohol measurement, and, as such, transferred the said police officer the driver’s circumstantial report containing the written confirmation to the said police officer.

As a result, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a copy of the State driver’s circumstantial statement report containing a driver’s certificate in the name of E, which is a private document, and used a forged document under the name of E.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol, and a driver of drinking alcohol;