The Defendant, with her husband B, is a person who has engaged in printing business under the trade name of “C” with her husband, and the victim D is a person who has supplied goods, such as copies, to the said company.

On March 25, 2015, the Defendant called the victim at a place where it is not known to him/her at a time, and concluded that “If he/she lends KRW 20 million to his/her friendship with his/her money play for 4 months until the end of July, 2015, the Defendant would jointly lend KRW 20 million to his/her friendship and receive interest of KRW 40,000,000 from 2.5% per month.”

However, at the time of the defendant's mother, he did not operate a bond business in the state of being receiving medical care due to stroke, and the money received from the injured was thought to be used as goods payment and living expenses for the customer, and there was no intention or ability to return the principal and interest of the loan until the agreed date because there was no particular property.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received money from the victim to the national bank account in the name of B on the same day, and acquired money from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in filing a complaint / [Punishment] Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and choice of imprisonment;