A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[2016 Highest 1501]

1. On November 21, 2015, Defendant A got on a taxi driven by the victim D (65 tax) on the roads in front of the Yannam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Sungnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on November 21, 2015, Defendant A got her face by hand while the victim was divingd. Defendant A was able to take the victim’s arms, take the victim’s arms, take the victim’s arms, and take the victim’s arms at a large sound while refusing to pay the taxi fee for about 15 minutes.

Accordingly, Defendant A assaulted the victim and interfered with the victim's taxi business by force.

2. Defendant A: (a) committed violence against D at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1) at the time, and at the place described in paragraph (1) 1, and the F of the police officer belonging to the Sung-nam Police Station E District called Sung-nam Police Station, who was called up after being reported 112; (b) prevented him from carrying the fating the fats by hand; (c) continuously arrested in the act of committing a crime on November 22, 2015; and (d) interfered with the lawful performance of duties concerning the handling of reports and the prevention of crimes by the said police officer, who was arrested in the act of committing a crime on the part of his hand during the police station Eth in the Sung-nam Police Station, and was seated by fating the fats of the police officer called up to G; and (d) interfered with the performance of duties by the said police officer on handling reports and preventing crimes

[2016 Highest 2259] On June 11, 2016, the Defendants received a 112 report to the effect that the Defendants are fighting in front of the Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, and demanded the police officer, who belongs to the police officer of the Sungnam-gu police station I police station, to hold a bath, and Defendant B expressed the above police officer’s desire to “I sprink, how I spick, I spick, I will do so.” Defendant A saw that the above police officer would be able to arrest the above police officer as the current offender of interference with the performance of official duties in order to arrest the above B as a criminal of interference with the performance of official duties. Defendant A was sprinked with the body of the above police officer by hand and pushed the police officer.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the above police officers to commit violence, thereby obstructing the above police officers from performing their legitimate duties relating to the maintenance of order and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

(b).