손해배상(자)
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
1.
1. The reasoning of this court’s acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases:
(In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable, and there are no errors as alleged by the plaintiffs in the grounds for appeal). Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "recognity" of the first instance part of the judgment of the court of first instance in the first part is limited to "o
Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "(14.325 km)" of 18 on the fourth 18 km shall be applied to "(14,352 km)".
Part V of the judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added:
“The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the Defendant had been negligent in carrying 12 pirt (13 tons) on the instant truck, i.e., the truck work, and neglecting the work to properly catch weight-centered (the Plaintiff’s grounds of appeal on August 14, 2019). However, it is insufficient to recognize that the evidence submitted by the Plaintiffs alone was insufficient to recognize that the Defendant had been negligent in performing the said truck work and in performing the work to appropriately catch weight-centered in the process, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise (the Defendant’s written brief on April 5, 2019).”
2. Conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is without merit.
The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.