2. Even when considering the fact that the Defendant was aware of and against the commission of the crime, and that there was no record of punishment by imprisonment, the instant crime is driving a vehicle that the Defendant did not have mandatory insurance without a driver’s license.

In light of the fact that the nature of the crime is not good in light of the background, method and contents, etc. of the crime, or that the victim did not agree with the victim or take any specific measures to recover the damage, and in full view of all the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided

[However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, Article 46 (2) 2 and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be amended to "Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015)" and "2. 3. 40 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment" shall be deleted.