2. The judgment of the court below on the grounds of sentencing (the crime of this case is committed by the defendant by taking advantage of his personal trust relationship with the victim who is an elementary school, and the contents and method of deception are not good, and the amount of deception is a big amount of 400 million won in total, and the damage has not been restored up to now, and the damage has not been restored up to now, while the defendant is divided and reflected, and the victim has paid a sum of 149 million won in total as interest, the victim has been repaid, and the damage has been repaid, and there is no special circumstance or circumstance that can be newly considered in sentencing after the court below sentenced the judgment of the court below, and comprehensively takes into account all the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the fact that there is no change in the circumstance or circumstance that the sentence imposed by the court below is proper, and it is too unreasonable to deem the defendant's argument to be unfair since it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.