beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.05.10 2017고단1176

상해

Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by six months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 17:20 on the 17:20th day of Naju City, and (b) on the ground that the wife E of the victim D (60 years of age) was fright at F’s house and was f’s chest, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as chins, tensions, and tensions, which require approximately three weeks of treatment on the left side of the victim, on the ground that the wife E considered F’s chest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Photographs (investigative records, 8 pages, 9 pages, 61 pages);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the types of decisions] the basic area [the scope of the recommended punishment] of the category 1 (Determination of the area of recommendation] of the general injury to violent crimes, from 4 months to 1 year and 6 months;

2. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for six months (two years of suspended sentence), and all the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered, taking into consideration the following circumstances.

Circumstances at a disadvantage: The degree of injury is significant because there is a record of punishment as a violent crime, and a serious effort to recover damage is not peeped.

It is difficult to see, since 2007, there is no record of punishment for violent crime, confession of crime, and misunderstanding.