2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. From January 20, 2014 to March 4, 2014, the Plaintiff supplied goods, such as frozen fishery products, to the “Cregnch” page operated by the Defendant A, and was not paid KRW 5,606,50, out of the price of the goods. As such, the Defendants should pay the said goods to the Plaintiff KRW 5,606,50.

B. The Plaintiff lent KRW 30 million to Defendant B and KRW 3.5 million to Defendant A. As such, the Defendants ought to pay the said KRW 33.5 million to the Plaintiff.

2. Determination

A. The written evidence Nos. 1 and 2 of the judgment on the claim for the purchase price of goods is insufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff has a claim for the purchase price of goods equivalent to KRW 5,606,50 against the Defendants, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion on this part is without merit.

B. According to the evidence No. 3-1 to No. 4 of the judgment on the loan claim, the Plaintiff remitted to Defendant B the amount of KRW 5 million on December 16, 2013, KRW 23 million on December 23, 2013, KRW 23 million on January 7, 2014, respectively, and the Defendant A remitted the amount of KRW 1.5 million on January 25, 2014 and KRW 2 million on January 21, 2014 respectively. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff lent money to the Defendants. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion on this part is without merit.

[In full view of the following circumstances, the Plaintiff transferred money to the Defendants, taking account of each of the aforementioned evidence and evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1 through 7 (the purport of the argument in addition to the virtual number included; i.e., the Plaintiff and the Defendants appear to have engaged in monetary transactions in relation to the operation of the relevant cover sheet; the Plaintiff did not prepare a loan certificate with the Defendants; and the Plaintiff did not enter into an agreement with the due date for repayment and interest; and the Plaintiff appears to have failed to demand repayment of the loan or payment of interest against the Defendants before filing the instant lawsuit after a long period of time after remitting the money as above.