beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.05.26 2015고정1914

상해등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 9, 2014, at around 11:05, Defendant A suffered injury to the victim by means of the following: (a) the Defendant’s residence on the sixth floor of G school located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F; (b) the victim H, the spouse of the Defendant’s family, was defective to the church; (c) the Defendant’s G school, the Defendant’s family, is bad and bad; and (d) the Defendant’s family, while having a dispute with the victim, he was faced with the victim’s clothes one time, she takes the face of the victim’s face one time, walking twice, and walking the Plaintiff at the her seat of about 14 days.

2. In the time and place indicated in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant destroyed a mobile phone owned by the victim by reducing the 2 cell phone jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by Defendant A in the first trial record (a statement to the effect that the facts charged with an injury are recognizable);

1. The portion of the statement made by the witness H in the second public trial record;

1. Third police statements made to H:

1. According to the report of the instant case on November 9, 201, the report of the Kakao Stockholm, the request for cooperation in investigation (112 reported data, etc.) (the foregoing Kakao Stockholm content, and the request for cooperation in investigation, on November 9, 2014, H reported the first report to Defendant A as I, a mobile phone, but the second report was reported to J, not his/her mobile phone, but the second report was reported to H, and H sent a message with the fact that H opened a mobile phone to the Defendant on November 11, 2014 and confirmed the present text.

The above facts are as follows: Defendant A, on November 112, 2014, made it impossible for Defendant A to leave the Handphone on the floor and use the Handphone on the floor; Defendant A set up the third floor and made secondary reports on the mobile phone of kindergarten teachers; Defendant A was unable to use the handphone until the mobile phone was opened in a new line with the Handphone; Defendant A newly opened the handphone and then Handphone.