2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On May 18, 2014, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Pakistan for short-term visit (C-3) sojourn and stayed in the Republic of Korea on May 18, 2014, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on August 22, 2014, whose period of sojourn expires.

B. On September 18, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s husband B, on August 2007, from around September 2007 to around September 2007, between the Plaintiff’s husband and the Plaintiff’s husband, the Plaintiff’s husband and the Plaintiff’s husband were to support and attempt to leave the Plaintiff’s husband. Around January 2008, the Plaintiff’s husband directly joined the Plaintiff’s husband and the Plaintiff’s husband’s husband’s husband’s underground seat.

B, after looking at the situation, the situation was distorted, entered the Republic of Korea on May 23, 2008, and returned to Pakistan on August 20, 2010. B, prior to returning, the second type D received e-mail to the effect that “Wer’s coarization is still waiting for width.” In this case, he was killed at the gun. It was left there.”

B’s husband E threatened with B that he would die of female life if he did not join B, and E was a total attack between B and the armed person who had a total in F on April 12, 201, when one year has passed, and B brought up B out of the house.

B reported to the police but E was not arrested but arrested only G et al., and became a bail.

Therefore, the Plaintiff.