beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.12.22 2016가단3136

손해배상

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 14,038,120 to the Plaintiff; and (b) KRW 5% per annum from June 23, 2016 to December 22, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the arguments in Gap evidence No. 1, evidence No. 2, evidence No. 3, evidence No. 4, evidence No. 10, evidence No. 11, evidence No. 12, evidence No. 13-1, evidence No. 14-1, evidence No. 15-1, evidence No. 14, evidence No. 15-1, 14, 18 through 25, 28, and evidence No. 16.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant delegated the work related to permission to engage in development activities on the parcel, other than Hancheon-gun B’s land and 11. On May 1, 2013, the Plaintiff obtained permission to engage in development activities (hereinafter “instant permission”) with the period of permission as to the parcel, other than the parcel, Hongcheon-gun B’s land, Gangwon-do, Hongcheon-gun, and five parcels, as of March 31, 2014.

B. On May 14, 2014, the Plaintiff received a public notice from Hongcheon-gun to attend a hearing or submit written opinions to revoke the permission for development activities upon the expiration of the pertinent permission period, and delegated the Defendant with the affairs to extend the permission period.

C. The defendant did not submit an application to extend the period of permission of this case to Hongcheon-gun, and did not attend the above hearing or submit a written opinion.

On July 9, 2014, Hongcheon-gun revoked the instant permission and issued an order to reinstate the Plaintiff.

E. The Plaintiff filed an objection to an order to reinstate with the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission. On July 22, 2015, the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission decided to withdraw an order to reinstate from Hongcheon-gun and to present its opinion on the procedures for permission to engage in development activities. If the Plaintiff and Hongcheon-gun consulted prior to the revocation of the instant permission, permission to change the period was possible

F. On October 27, 2015, the Plaintiff obtained permission for development activities by setting the permission period from Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun as of September 30, 2016 with respect to five parcels, other than Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun.

G. On January 7, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 2,000,000 to the Defendant and March 7, 2015.