2. In full view of the crime related to violence and the crime of obstruction of execution of official duties, the Defendant committed the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. of this case during the repeated crime period following the completion of the punishment due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, the elements of disadvantageous sentencing, such as spitation, etc., that are disadvantageous to the police officers, such as spiting, etc., that the Defendant reflects the crime, that the Defendant’s economic condition is insufficient, and the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines (at least one year of imprisonment), the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.