2. It is recognized that the defendant paid a retirement allowance to some retired workers in the course of the investigation by the Busan Eastern District Office, and the defendant revoked the complaint against the defendant.

However, considering the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, although the defendant agreed on the payment of wages with D, E and the above agreement was not actually performed, the defendant's age, age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to each of the crimes in this case, circumstances leading to each of the crimes in this case, and circumstances leading to the sentencing conditions in the records, etc., the court below's punishment is appropriate and too unreasonable (the defendant asserts that the defendant's punishment is unfair because of collusion with D, F and G to the effect that the damage to the chain company of the vessel material manufacturing business of the defendant's operation of the defendant was caused by each of the crimes in this case, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it in the records). Accordingly, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, ex officio in accordance with Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the "C" of the criminal facts column of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected to "I of a stock company"]