When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is also the owner of the bandon truck.

Where the owner of a motor vehicle intends to change the structure of a motor vehicle prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, he/she shall obtain approval from the head of the relevant Si/Gun/Gu, and shall not operate a motor vehicle with knowledge

Nevertheless, from September 27, 2013 to August 28, 2014, the Defendant knowingly operated an automobile with the knowledge of the removal of the wall between the driver's seat and the loading box without obtaining approval for structural change, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The application of the law to photograph the violating vehicle (the defendant's assertion that the vehicle in this case was a vehicle with structural change but it was parked in front of the house and not operated. However, even if the defendant's statement was based on the defendant's statement, it can be recognized that the defendant was in learning several times during the possession of the vehicle in this case. Thus, the above assertion is not accepted).

1. Article 81 subparagraph 20 of the Automobile Management Act and Article 34 of the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Optional fine;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant did not directly change the structure, and it appears that the Defendant was trying to correct illegal matters, taking into account the period during which the Defendant owned the instant vehicle, the number of actual operation, and the distance.