2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On April 18, 2013, the Plaintiff born in the People’s Republic of China and entered Korea, and reported the marriage with Nonparty C, a national of the Republic of Korea, who is a national of the National Pension Scheme (hereinafter “the deceased”).

The Deceased died on November 21, 2014.

B. The Plaintiff asserted that the deceased’s spouse falls under the bereaved family under Article 73(1)1 of the National Pension Act and filed a claim for the payment of the survivor pension with the Defendant. However, the Defendant rendered a decision equivalent to the survivor pension as of June 10, 2015 on the ground that the deceased’s spouse does not fall under the spouse whose livelihood was maintained by the deceased at the time of

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

On the other hand, on June 15, 2015, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit on November 25, 2015, the 90th day after being served with the instant disposition.

[Ground of recognition] No dispute, evident facts, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the whole purport of pleading

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

가. 원고의 주장 원고는 망인의 배우자로서 망인의 사망 무렵 망인을 간호하면서 망인과 사이에 태어난 아이에 대한 양육을 담당하였고 망인 명의의 신용카드를 이용하여 생계를 유지하고 있었으므로 당연히 제1순위의 유족연금 지급대상자라고 할 것인데, 피고가 망인의 부모와 동생으로부터 먼저 부당한 유족연금 지급청구를 받고 원고가 망인의 사망 직전에 시댁의 방해로 잠시 망인과의 연락이 두절되었던 사정만을 들어 제대로 된 조사나 확인을 거치지 아니하고 자의적으로 이 사건 처분을 하였는바, 그 하자가 중대명백하여 무효이다.

(b) The attached Form of relevant statutes is as follows.

(b) In order for a defective administrative disposition to be void as a matter of course, it must be objectively apparent that the defect is a serious breach of an essential part of the law and regulations, and the defect is significant and apparent.