A. 1) The Plaintiffs are the cooperatives of this case, with the trade name of “D” between the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (hereinafter “the instant association”).

(2) Around September 16, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract for the provision of food and drink for one person per year from September 16, 2013 to September 16, 2014, with the trade name of “F”, and the Defendant entered into a contract for the provision of food and beverage for one year from September 16, 2013 to September 20, 2014.

3) On June 25, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract with the instant association through Plaintiff A, a member of the instant association, to receive KRW 19,000 per annum for a year from August 1, 2014 to July 31, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the “contract for the supply of food in the instant compound”).

Upon entering into the instant agreement, the instant association agreed to pay KRW 100,000 to the Defendant at the time of the instant agreement for the supply of plastic food. On July 2, 2014, the Plaintiff, a member of the instant association, paid KRW 100,000,000 to the Defendant via the Plaintiff B, a member of the instant association. (4) The instant association purchased freezing vehicles in exchange for the costs of KRW 13,320,00,000, and installed a publicity stipulation on the freezing vehicle in exchange for the costs of KRW 1.5,00,00,000, and prepared for the implementation of the instant agreement for the supply of plastic food to the Defendant.

5 Around July 16, 2014, the Defendant unilaterally notified the Plaintiff A of the cancellation of the instant contract for the supply of housing bags.

On July 16, 2014, the Defendant stated the account number to return the deposit to Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff B notified the Defendant of the account number on that day.

Plaintiff

A on July 17, 2014, text messages to the Defendant, “If a contract has been unilaterally destroyed, it is not possible to return the deposit and pay damages if the contract would have been unilaterally cancelled. How is the defect would be hot, if the contract is avoided by telephone, and how it would be frighted. The liquor tax invoice is required.”