특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(횡령)등
[Defendant A] The part of the lower judgment against Defendant A is reversed.
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
(b).
I. Summary of the grounds for appeal
1. Defendant A
A. (i) part of 2011.14.14.14.2009 - The portion of the fictitious payment of 12.1 billion won for stock price of October 14, 2009 - the facts constituting the crime of the lower judgment 1-A.
1)가)항 ㈎ 피고인은 주식회사 X(이하 ‘X’이라 한다) 대표이사인 Y으로 하여금 가장납입을 하도록 범의를 유발하지 않았으며, 양도성예금증서(CD) 이외에는 담보로 제공할 것이 없었던 Y의 거듭된 요청으로 양도성예금증서(CD)를 담보로 한 대출을 중개해주었을 뿐이다.
㈏ 원심은 ‘피고인이 X의 주식 가치 및 재무상태 등을 파악하고 있었고, 주금납입은행인 기업은행 구로중앙지점과 증자등기를 할 법무사를 피고인이 직접 지정한 것’을 근거로 피고인에게 이 부분 공소사실에 대한 기능적 행위지배를 인정하였다.
However, the Defendant was aware of X’s stock value and financial status not to help X make the most advanced payment, but rather to evaluate the possibility of credit recovery, to make a legitimate stock loan (such as KRW 3 billion on October 20, 2009, KRW 3 billion on November 5, 2009, and KRW 3 billion on November 5, 2009). A certified judicial scrivener in charge of the registration of capital increase was designated as the Defendant and BI (hereinafter “BI”) for the purpose of clearly collecting loans.
In addition, the corporate bank's old central branch of the company bank where the share capital of KRW 12 billion was deposited on October 14, 2009 is not a bank designated by the defendant for the payment of the share capital with capital increase.
(피고인이 위 은행을 유상증자대금 납입 은행으로 지정하였다고 인정할 수 있는 증거도 없다). ㈐ BH, AD, Z은 X의 2010. 7. 20.자 가장납입과 관련하여 진술하였을 뿐, 이 부분 공소사실에 관한 진술을 한 적이 없다.
In addition, BD is a person who served as the president of the former CE from February 2010, and there is no relation to this part of the facts charged.