손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff J, AJ, AK, and AV are all dismissed.
2. The plaintiffs' claims except the plaintiffs J, AJ, AK, and AV.
1. The plaintiff J, the AJ, the AK, and the AV ex officio determination as to the legitimacy of the lawsuit of the plaintiff J, the plaintiff J, the J, the AJ, the AJ, the AK, and the AV do not have any claim against the defendant (the claim amount is zero won as stated in the attached list). The plaintiff J, the AJ, the AJ, the AK, and the AV lawsuit are all unlawful since they do not have any interest to file a lawsuit.
2. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims except the plaintiffs J, AJ, AK, and AV (hereinafter "Bs plaintiffs").
A. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 10, and 14:
1) From spring of 2013 to spring of the same year, the remaining plaintiffs were those who cultivate old marbling in a day-to-day zone. The defendant is a legal entity that mainly runs the business of growing seeds and seedlings and growing research, and the production and sale of seeds and seedlings and farming materials. 2) The remaining plaintiffs requested BB to purchase seeds and seedlings in order to prepare for the cultivation of seed around March 2013. Accordingly, BC ordered the defendant to purchase seeds for drinking (variety variety: e.g., e., g., g., e., g., e., g., e., g., e., g., e., g., e., e., g., e., g., e., g., e., e., g., e., b., e., e., e., g., e., e., g., e., e., e., g., b., e.
3) Occurrence of brut and brut bottles