However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On August 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received the proposal that “When sending a e-mail card, the Defendant would create a e-mail passbook by raising credit rating by accumulating financial transaction performance; and (b) was unable to obtain a low-interest credit loan in a normal way; (c) lent a accessible medium connected to the Defendant’s account to a person who was not the name of the party; (d) compiled the transaction performance by unlawful means; and (e) submitted it as if the Defendant was the normal transaction performance, and received a credit loan by submitting it to the data as if the Defendant was the actual transaction performance.

Accordingly, on August 14, 2017, at around 10:00, the Defendant sent one copy of the C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-

Accordingly, the Defendant lent the access media for the purpose of using the above crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the certificate of confirmation of request for remittance of others and the statement of separate accounts;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 3 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which the punishment is chosen (or choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant has no criminal record for the same kind of crime, there is no criminal record more severe punishment than a fine for the crime of this kind, and that his mistake has been repented in depth while confession