2. The decision shows the attitude of the defendant to reflect his mistake, the fact that the victim of interference with business reached an agreement with the victim at the trial of the party, and the fact that the defendant has no means to punish the defendant, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several times, including the suspension of execution of imprisonment due to violence, obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., the crime of this case is repeated, and the defendant needs to be punished strictly in order to establish national legal order and eradicate the landscape of public authority, and other factors such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, home environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, and the result of the application of the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee, etc., it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.