A. The Plaintiff A operated the manufacture of machinery parts with the trade name “D” and the Plaintiff B operated the processing of semiconductor parts, etc. with the trade name “E”.

2) The Defendant is a stock company with the purpose of manufacturing boiler parts and wholesale and retail business.

3) F is a person who entered the Defendant Company around May 2017 and worked as the head of the commodity purchase division.

B. As indicated in the Plaintiffs and the Defendant’s transactional relationship [the table] attached, Plaintiff A provided the Defendant with each of the goods worth a total of KRW 34,528,395 won, and Plaintiff B provided the goods worth a total of KRW 25,427,490 (hereinafter “instant goods”).

[Attachment 0. 0. 20. 07. 0. 20. 0. 1, 20. 0. 1, 20. 7. 0. 1, 20. 1, 310, 67. 19. 2, 200. 1, 156, 00. 3, 424, 96. 7. 8. 1, 20. 20. 8, 20. 1, 30. 1, 424, 96. 7. 1, 207. 1, 200. 1, 207 1, 206. 7. 4, 207 1, 207 24, 2007 8. 24, 2000 2, 207 87. 4, 2017 3. 4, 2017

C. In the process of the relevant criminal case, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiffs and F in the form of fraud, and the result of the disposition is as follows (hereinafter “relevant criminal case”). (1) The part of the summary order (Plaintiff A and F) against the Plaintiff A and F was filed with the Incheon District Court approximately 27924 high order against the Plaintiff A and F.

The criminal facts are as follows:

① Plaintiff A and F agreed to deliver parts to the Defendant with F’s aid around July 2017. At F’s request, Plaintiff A and F issued a transaction statement as if they were supplied even if they did not supply parts.