However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around September 8, 2016, the Defendant, a naturalization woman in Vietnam, worked in D, a vehicle parts company in Daegu-gun, working for the said company, on the second floor of the dormitory of the said company (hereinafter “Defendant 38 years old”), followed the victim E, working for the said company on the second floor of the said company’s dormitory (hereinafter “the Defendant left the dormitory toilet”) and followed the other employees by having talked with the said company. The Defendant, in double hand, boomed the victim’s arms, pushed the victim, pushed down the victim’s arms, biffed with dangerous things (automobile parts, length of 26cm, width of 20cm), and inflicted injury on the victim, such as open wifes, which requires approximately 3 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to deadly weapons and photographs attached to the body;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. The reasoning for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act acknowledges and reflects his mistake, the Defendant is a primary offender who has no record of the crime, the injury suffered by the victim is relatively minor, and the circumstances, such as the details and degree of the instant crime, are considered as indicated in the disposition.