However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On November 16, 2013, the defendant prepared a false complaint against E using a computer at the office of the defendant in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office.

The written complaint states that "The annexed agreements attached to the Dr.e. F Joint Manufacturing Agreement prepared by the defendant E on May 22, 2013 between the complainant and the defendant defendant shall be prepared and inserted pursuant to paragraph 4, and the seal of the company held after the addition of Paragraph 5 shall be affixed to the attached agreements and shall be punished for forging and using the attached agreements, and E did not have any forgery of the attached agreements."

Nevertheless, on November 19, 2013, the defendant submitted the above written complaint to the officials in charge of the above written complaint to which his name cannot be known at the public service center of the public prosecutor's office of the Goyang-gu's office located in the Dong-dong Dong-dong, Yongsan-gu.

In this respect, the defendant committed a false accusation for the purpose of having E receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Each Drma's joint production contract, each annexed agreement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the petition for criminal investigation (106 pages);

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) (i.e., first offender) or more of the Criminal Act;