beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.11.29 2018고단1051

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 29, 2018, the Defendant sent the said “C” operated by the Defendant on the 19:00 Daegu-gu B and 3th floor, and sent the said “D” to 2 rooms in return for the sexual traffic from the reduced level D belonging to the police station in Daegu-gu, which pretended to be customers, and provided guidance to 1.2 thousand won in cash in return for the sexual traffic, and ordered E who are women in sexual traffic to engage in similar sexual intercourse, and arranged to engage in sexual traffic by sending it to 2 rooms in the above place at around 20:20 on the same day. At around 20:20, the Defendant received 120,000 won in return for the reduced number of the police station belonging to the Southern-gu, Daegu-gu, which provided the said place of business and provided guidance to 20,000 won in return for the said act of sexual intercourse, and provided guidance to 1,000 won in return for the said act of sexual traffic to 1,018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc. of Arranging Punishment

1. The act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is to commercialize sex and to impair good morals, and has no significant social harm, but to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes, and the liability for such crime is not minor;

In particular, even though the defendant had been punished several times for the same crime, including the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor, he again committed the crime of this case, and even after he was under the control of the police in January 2018, there is a possibility of criticism.