beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.07.14 2017노80

전자금융거래법위반

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (three million won in penalty) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex, motive for and frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too uneasable and unreasonable, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the confession of the crime; (b) the benefit acquired by the crime of this case appears to be nonexistent; and (c) the head of the passbook transferred by the Defendant has yet to be used in the criminal act of Bosing fraud; and (d) the quality of the crime was not somewhat weak.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.