beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.04.15 2014가단22119

어음금

Text

1. The plaintiff

A. The Defendants jointly joined KRW 25,000,000 and Defendant C from March 11, 2014 to October 201, 2014.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 10, 2014, the number of bills issued Nos. 1 D 1D 1 D 1 D 1 D 20,000,000 won on December 10, 2013, Defendant No. 2 (E) A2-12 F 20,000 won on January 7, 2014, the No. 2-3 G G 2-3 G 3, 2014, KRW 30,000 won on April 10, 2014, Defendant No. CH 4 I 28,000,000 won on April 10, 2014, each of the instant electronic bills issued to Defendant No. 3 (E) and future electronic bills issued to Defendant No. NA Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “AF”) on May 10, 2014, respectively.

B. An endorsement and refusal of the bill, the Plaintiff’s claim for reimbursement, and the Plaintiff’s claim for reimbursement to Defendant C, and the Defendant C, in sequence, exempted the Plaintiff from drawing up the protest to the bill No. 1 (hereinafter “instant bill”). The other bills as indicated above shall be abbreviationd as above) and transferred it after signing the protest at KRW 25 million.

The plaintiff presented the bill No. 1 at the time of payment but refused payment at the time of payment.

C. The Defendant C, around January 2014, endorsed the instant bill No. 3, indicated the amount of endorsement at KRW 30 million on the instant bill No. 3 and delivered it to the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff presented the payment of the said Promissory Notes in the electronic form on the date of payment, but was rejected.

The Defendant B, around February 2014, endorsed the instant bill No. 4, indicated the amount of endorsement at KRW 20 million on the instant bill No. 4 and delivered it to the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff presented the payment of the Promissory Notes in the electronic form at the date of payment, but the payment was refused.

E. The Plaintiff’s claim for electronic reimbursement against Defendant C and B should be made electronically (Article 13 of the Issuance and Distribution of Electronic Bills Act). The Plaintiff’s claim for reimbursement against the endorsers is made on November 26, 2015.