2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the respective repayment period was set on April 30, 2016 and lent 6,200,000 UN to the Defendant and sought the return of the loan.

B. As to this, the Defendant asserts that, from the Plaintiff who had maintained the relation between Japan and Japan, only received the gift of 3 million UN around March 201 to April 17, 201 and 3 million UN on April 17, 201, the Defendant did not borrow the above money, and the loan certificate (Evidence A 1 and 2) constitutes a false representation of conspiracy and thus constitutes a false representation of conspiracy.

2. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged as comprehensively considering the overall purport of arguments in each statement and image of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 1 and 2 (including the number of branch numbers), were prepared by the defendant, i.e., ① the plaintiff's respective repayment period as of April 30, 201, with the defendant as of January 19, 201, Japan 3 million, Japan 3.2 million, Japan 3.2 million, Japan 17 April 2011 (hereinafter "each loan certificate of this case"), and it is difficult to view that the defendant's total repayment period was 0,000,000 UN 6,0000,0000,0000,0000,000 were 6,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000 won.

Therefore, the defendant is a civil law from May 1, 2016 to September 1, 2016, the delivery date of a copy of the complaint in this case, which is 6.2 million U.N. and the following day after the repayment date for the loan to the plaintiff.