A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

"2013 Highest 298"- Defendant A

1. On April 19, 2013, around 00:20, the injured Defendant: (a) expressed that the victim F (the age of 65) was able to take a bath to the victim on the ground that the victim F (the age of 65) was posted on the Defendant’s vehicle on the Defendant’s vehicle; (b) expressed the victim’s face at 5-6 times in drinking; (c) asked the victim’s face at 5-6 times in drinking; and (d) asked the victim’s left part at one time in riding, thereby impairing the victim’s character of head part requiring treatment for about two weeks.

2. On the same day at 00:55 on the same day, the Defendant spited the brin of H one time on the face of H, which was called “AC” from a police officer, a police officer belonging to the Tong-gu Police Station G District G District, who was called “AC,” “AC, I spite, I spite, I spite on the face of H, and I spite one time on the face of H, who was a police officer belonging to the same district group, to arrest the Defendant in a flagrant act. The victim I (the age of 58) who was a police officer belonging to the same district group was defective in order to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant act.

After the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender, at around 01:10 on the same day, the Defendant saw the victim K (25 years of age) who is a police officer belonging to the same district group in the G District Office located in the J of the same city as above, to sit the Defendant, and she spited the Defendant 3-4 times on the face of the Haak-ro, on the ground that the victim K (25 years of age) tried to sit the Defendant.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers' criminal investigation, and at the same time, the victim I was in an inspection team on both sides requiring medical treatment for about two weeks, and the victim K was in an inspection team on the left side side of the need for medical treatment for about two weeks.

"2013 Highest 1083"- Defendant A, B

1. When Defendant A, B, and L’s fabrication of private document made it difficult for Defendant B to manage clothes with Defendant B’s operation, Defendant B, along with L with L with his husband’s husband M, “Y Young-si E apartment 106-305” owned by Defendant B.