If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Defendant

A around August 6, 2014, around 16:25, around 16:25, the head of Suwon-si Home Pamper datum used the shopping cart installed by the victim B, which prevents the passage from the 1st floor of the same household datum, and used the victim's arms and descendants by taking the victim's resistance and taking the bath against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Application of B’s written laws and regulations;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act / [Defendant B] The summary of the indictment against the defendant is that "When the defendant was dissatisfied with the above criminal facts of the defendant A, he saw the victim A to take a bath, puts the victim's hand, and pusheds the victim's knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif kn

[Defendant C] The summary of the facts charged against the Defendant is as follows: “The Defendant expressed the desire to fight between the wife B and the victim within the Criminal System of Suwon-nam Police Station around 10:30 on August 10, 2014, and insulting the victim,” so the Defendant is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim can be aware of the fact that the complaint was revoked after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution against the Defendant is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.