대여금
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following dismissal or addition, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
On July 1, 2016, “The date of the closing of argument in this case” in Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance was “the date of the court of first instance.” On Part 5, Part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance (Supreme Court Decision 2012Do12850), “The date of the closing of argument in this case,” and later, “Loan 2013Da57644, which was brought against the Defendants by the Plaintiff, was cultivated under the Incheon District Court Decision 2013Da10476, which was brought against the Defendants, and was transferred to 2014Gahap10454, and became final and conclusive as is
In addition, “Around July 1, 2016, the judgment against the Plaintiff was rendered, and the Plaintiff appealed and appealed to Seoul High Court 2016Na105844)” in Part 7 of Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance. Subsequent to the “Loan 2014, Incheon District Court 2014Gaso87, 8957,” “The Loan was cultivated by 2015Da17766, and was transferred to 2015Kahap494, and was subsequently handed down on July 1, 2016,” “The Loan was continued by 2016Na105844,” in Part 7 of Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance.
2. If so, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just as it is concluded, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.