However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 6, 2017, at around 03:30 on December 6, 2017, the Defendant reported that the Defendant did not pay the drinking value in front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, and requested the Defendant to return home after paying the drinking value, and the police officer slope D belonging to the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Police Station C police box of Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, requested the Defendant to return home after paying the drinking value, the Defendant was able to have the objection, 47 knife the patrol knife, knife the knife, knife the knife, knife the knife, knife on the road.

Accordingly, I tried to move the defendant to India for the safety purpose of D, and assaulted D's chest face by pushing the defendant with a view to "I am to this spath".

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Application of the statutes governing screen pictures and CDs;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant reflects his fault in depth, appears to be a contingent crime, the defendant has no criminal records exceeding the same kind and fine, and all of the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are shown in the records, shall be determined like the order.