2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant was aware of the victim B at the main point of "D" in Busan Jung-gu, as an employee, while working as an employee. A.

On November 11, 2012, the Defendant, within the main point of “F” located in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, with the victim, stolen money and valuables equivalent to KRW 220,000,000 in the market price, both of the victim and the victim used the gap between toilets, the victim used the gap between toilets, and the cash 10,000,000 in the market price, and the cash 220,000,000,000 in the bank BC credit card (G) in Busan.

B. On November 11, 2012, around 04:45, the Defendant denied the amount of KRW 1,035,550 all over 15 times, as in the separate crime list, including, but not limited to, the payment of KRW 150,00,00, the amount of KRW 150,000, which was stolen, presented to the victim BC credit card as set forth in paragraph (a) and presented to the victim, who demanded the pre-paid account at the main point of “J” operated by the victim I in Jung-gu, Busan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Each statement of I,K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, and R;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (Fraud), Article 70 (1) and 3 of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act (the use of credit card illegally), and the choice of fines;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.