except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Poter II freezing.

On April 14, 2011, the Defendant got to proceed from the direction of the salet to the salet at the direction of the salet, a letter, located in the salet of the wife population, at the time of Tae-si on the 18:16th day of 201.

At night, the victim C(63 years of age) was walking on the right side of the Defendant’s driving direction, so in such a case, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle, has a duty of care to look at the front and rear left, accurately manipulate the steering gear, and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and found the victim late and did not avoid it, and received the victim's body flick part in front of the right part of the defendant's vehicle by negligence.

Ultimately, at around January 14, 2013, the Defendant caused the death of the above victim due to such occupational negligence from the hospital of the wife population D to the non-satisfym.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning autopsys;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession, reflectivity, agreement with the bereaved family members of the victim, and the first offense)