A. Defendant C operates a hospital as an external medical specialist, and Defendant B is an external medical specialist belonging to the hospital.

B. On November 8, 2010, the Plaintiff, who was within a hospital, was subject to the internal supervision and internal supervision of the relevant hospital.

As a result, the plaintiff's complaint and the ledger were confirmed on the part of the plaintiff's complaint, trajection, and melting species (as a result of the organizational inspection opinion).

C. On October 4, 2012, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms coming from the fluence and fluence, and Defendant B had the Plaintiff go to the D Hospital on October 5, 2012, and had the Plaintiff conduct an internal inspection of the fluence and the fluence of the fluence.

Accordingly, on October 5, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to an internal crypology test conducted by internal crypology test. Before the procedure, the Plaintiff signed the written consent for the internal crypology test and the written consent for the crypology test (the crypology test) using the internal crypology.

(1) No. 2) d.

On October 15, 2012, around 15:29, Defendant B confirmed 11 of the type of melting test to the Plaintiff, among the above internal border test with respect to the Plaintiff, and implemented the internal-pacting solvent that reduces the amount of special use to the end of the straw and then uses electricity.

E. After the instant reguination, Defendant B solicited the Plaintiff to undergo a transitional observation, and accordingly, the Plaintiff hospitalized in D Hospital around October 17, 2012.

Until the time, the plaintiff was measured by a somewhat high blood pressure (160/120) and did not have any other vitality.

F. On October 5, 2012, the Plaintiff showed blood transfusion around 23:00, and there was no particular difference compared to the Plaintiff’s active symptoms at the time of hospitalization.

On October 6, 2012, the Plaintiff showed the blood side around 00:00 and October 6, 2012, and around 01:20 on October 6, 2012, the intention to take charge was administered by the Plaintiff with the TON TON, TON and Tropt.

On October 6, 2012, Defendant B confirmed the Plaintiff’s blood transfusion more accurately and, if necessary, take measures for the blood transfusion.