가. 사실오인 피고인은 당시 자신의 테이블에 앉아 음악에 맞추어 손가락을 튕기는 행위를 하였을 뿐 피해자를 향하여 손가락 하트를 만들어 보인 사실이 없고 피해자에게 다가간 사실조차도 없다.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in mistake.

B. The lower court’s sentence of an unreasonable sentencing (3 million won of fine, 40 hours of order to complete a program) imposed on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대한 판단 원심은 피해자의 원심 법정진술(피고인이 음악에 맞추어 노래를 부르며 피해자를 향하여 손가락을 튕기고 손가락 하트를 만들어 보이는 등 피해자의 관심을 끌려다가 피해자가 외면하자 같은 행동을 하며 피해자의 근처로 다가와 피해자의 목과 머리카락 부위를 스치듯이 만졌다는 취지의 진술)을 증거로 채용하여 이 사건 공소사실을 유죄로 인정하였다.

The victim's statement is consistent with the main part of the first investigation stage from the original investigation stage to the original court's court, and is hard to describe without direct experience. In light of the empirical rule, there is no unreasonable or contradictory part in itself in light of the empirical rule, and it is true that the victim's statement and record are not contradictory. In full view of the circumstances before and after the crime of this case known in the victim's statement and record, it can be acknowledged that the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim, such as the facts charged, and therefore,

B. Examining the circumstances leading to the instant crime and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s determination of sentencing was not deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, but the lower court’s determination of sentencing was not deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, and there is a special reason to change the sentence of the lower court when it comes to the final trial.