On December 6, 2013, the Defendant driven the above-mentioned vehicle around 18:18, and led to the progress of the vehicle at a burtour parking lot located in the driving-gu of the original city.

It is a commercial parking lot and at the time, the victim D-A-D car was parked, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely operating the wheel and brake system in advance by making the driver of the vehicle well seeing the left, right, and right, right, and right, and right, and right, and right, and right, and right, right and duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and caused the above part of the above part of the vehicle's left side by negligence, which led to the shocking side of the above part of the vehicle's left side.

After all, the Defendant damaged the car of the above Awddidy amounting to approximately KRW 2,073,390 for repair costs by occupational negligence as above.

2. The determination is a crime falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

However, according to the written agreement dated September 22, 2014, it can be recognized that the victim D withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on September 22, 2014, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.