모욕
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
At around 03:30 on October 19, 2013, the Defendant openly insulting the victim by providing the victim F, who was a police officer belonging to the Namyang Police Station E box called the Defendant and recommended him to pay the drinking value, without paying the drinking value at Dju points located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the Defendant: (a) around 03:30 on October 19, 2013; and (b) on the grounds that the victim F, a police officer belonging to the Namyang Police Station E box, who was called upon upon receipt of a report, recommended the Defendant to pay the drinking value; (c) there are several persons, such as the police officer and the main manager, and female employees, etc. dispatched together; and (d) the victim F, “I am, kbb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb k k kb kb k kb k k k k k
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement concerning G and F;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;
1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant is against his/her will) ;
1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation Act, and the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant had no memory under the influence of alcohol at the time, and they were in the state of mental disorder or mental and physical disability. Thus, according to the aforementioned evidence, the defendant was found to have been under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the crime, but there was no ability to discern things or make decisions accordingly.
Since it seems that the defendant and his defense counsel were in a state or weak condition, the above assertion is rejected.