However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 22, 2013, at least 04:20, the Defendants received 112 reports from E Cabter located in Pyeongtaek-si D and received confirmation of their intention to pay the drinking value from G (the age of 41) affiliated with the G (the age of Habk Police Station). Defendant A expressed his motive to the effect that “I ambling off the body of the above G,” and Defendant B ambling the body of the above G to the effect that “I ambling off, I amb off, I amb off, I amb off the face of the victim,” and Defendant B ambling the body of the above G police station to the effect that “I ambling off the body of the victim, I amb off the body of the above police station, and amb off the face of the victim who is in need of treatment due to debrising.” Defendant B 1 ambling the above G police station’s face with the wall of the victim, and amb off the above part of the wall.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the on-site dispatch and the arrest of flagrant offenders, and the victims of the above police officer were injured.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution

1. Statement of the police statement related H and G;

1. A written statement of I;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, etc.