On September 21, 2011, around 12:47, the Defendant considered the victim E and F’s 10 neighbors in Changwon-si E and F’s 10 neighbors to have made public statements that the victim F would have good himself/herself at the community service center. In contrast, the Defendant expressed to the victim F the victim F that he/she would have good for himself/herself at the community service center. The Defendant expressed to the victim F the victim “I am hye, who would have to take the place of the Nowon-gu Madar Madar, which would have caused the occurrence of the Madar Madar Madar. I am hye and hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. A fine not exceeding 200,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day);

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of sentence, circumstances of crimes, etc.);