도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentencing of the lower court (two years of suspended execution of June, community service, forty hours of lecture, forty hours of lecture course of compliance driving) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is unreasonable because it is too uneasible.
2. The Defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, such as drinking, driving without a license, etc.
However, in full view of the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, circumstance, means and consequence of the crime, etc., including the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, family relation, the motive and consequence of the crime, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may change the sentencing of the lower court after the lower judgment, the lower court’s sentencing is not unfair.
3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.