beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.10.30 2017고정270

동물보호법위반

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a director of the D Training Center Management Office in each state of women, and the defendant B is a person who serves as a head of the facility of the above Training Center.

No person shall kill an animal by cruel methods, such as hanging trees.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to kill the garment for reasons of difficulties in the management of the training center, such as laundry, etc. due to the laundry that inhabits around the above training center. From October 2016 to November 201 of the same year, the Defendants: (a) installed two networks for catching the garment in the above training center; (b) induced the garment by inserting food into the garment with the garment in which the garment was contained; and (c) died in a way that the garment was cruel by gathering the garment in the garment with the water and cutting the garment in the garment with the water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 46 (1), Article 8 (1) 1, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, as well as Article 46 (1), Article 8 (1) 1 of the Animal Protection Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Confiscation (Defendant A) Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, applicable to the order of provisional payment;