성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(특수강간)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of this case, the punishment imposed by the court below (including imprisonment with labor for 6 years, confiscation with 1 knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife and completion of sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours) is too unreasonable (the defendant, from June 7, 2015, did not carry the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife).
Examining the various sentencing conditions in the instant case, it does not appear that the Defendant committed the instant crime in a consistent and contingent manner in light of the following: (a) when the Defendant was in the first instance, the Defendant appears to have both the time and reflect on the instant crime; (b) the Defendant did not have any history of committing the same sex crime; (c) there was no history of criminal punishment exceeding the suspension of execution; (d) there was a disability of class 4; and (e) the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in a consistent and contingent manner
On the other hand, the crime of this case is committed by ① the victim living together with her husband.