However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 23, 2013, the defendant, as the representative of the agricultural company C&C, is doubtful that peace D is winding. On March 23, 2013, the defendant heard that D is a victim E (n, 42 years of age) and telephone call within D’s vehicle, and made suspicion that the victim and her husband are internal relations.

On March 25, 2013, around 10:45, the Defendant found the victim in C's office located in F at the official city, and used the victim to sit in the table, and used the victim as a deadly weapon (9.5m in the blade length) prepared in advance at a bank, to cut off the transition (9.5m in the blade length) of a deadly weapon, which was prepared in advance at the bank, and to assault and threaten the victim.

With respect to intimidation, the prosecutor instituted a public prosecution on the following facts: “The defendant was trying to keep the victim in mind at present”; “The defendant taken a deadly weapon, laid down the victim’s head head, salking him/her, suck up him/her by side, and threatened the victim as he/she was in his/her hand, and as he/she was in his/her hand, by threatening him/her.”

However, among the contents of intimidation, the statement of the police statement on the victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's intimidation is not directly witness and statement in light of the victim's prosecutor's office and this court's statement. Thus, the statement of each police's statement about G's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's statement in G is difficult to believe it as it is in light of G's statement that "the victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's statement is knife's victim's victim's interest, and