A shall be punished by imprisonment for 8 months and fine for 5,00,000 won, and by imprisonment for 4 months and fine for 3,00,000 won.

Defendant

A is a person who operates the mutual entertainment center of "H" in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant B is a person who works as a regular manager of the foregoing business.

On April 1, 2015, at around 22:34, the Defendants: (a) received 3.10,000 won from female employees I and J as the price for sexual traffic except for drinking drinking, respectively, from K and L; and (b) had the said K and L with female employees, together with other employees, arrange them to be sexual intercourse in 307 and 308, respectively on the ground of the above building through an elevator connected with the said entertainment mainly with the said employees; (c) conspired to act as a broker for sexual traffic; and (d) conspired to act as a broker for sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of the police officer against I, J, K, or L;

1. Each statement of I, J, K, and L;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning criminal facts, Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of punishment (the Defendants) and the concurrent imposition of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging Sexual Traffic)

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse (the Defendants)

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the Defendants)

1. Protective observation and community service order (the Defendants)

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (defendants)

1. The basic area (from June to January and April) of the types of recommendations (the scope of recommendations) prescribed in the sentencing criteria for the punishment of persons aged 19 or older, the mediation of commercial sex acts and commercial sex acts, etc. (the mediation of commercial sex acts, etc. by business, receipt of prices, etc.).

2. The specific reasons for sentencing are the business owner of this case. Defendant B is the business owner of this case. Defendant B is recognized as a criminal act in this court, and Defendants did not have the same criminal record, and Defendants did not have the same kind of criminal record. In addition, Defendants’ age, occupation, sex, degree of participation in the criminal act, business size and period, profits from the criminal act, and criminal acts.