2. The fact that the defendant recognized his/her criminal act and against himself/herself, limited his/her ability to work due to disease, such as traging, shouldering, and shouldering, and the fact that he/she is a recipient under the National Basic Living Security Act is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, even though the defendant did not pay an administrative fine and did not recover his number plate according to the procedure, the crime of this case is not likely to be operated by attaching another number plate to his own motor vehicle.

In addition, taking into account the various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.