A. The reasons why the court should explain the cited part of this case are as follows.

In addition to the amendment of the judgment of the first instance as in the following paragraph (2), the part of the judgment of the first instance is identical to the part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance, and the corresponding part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. (1) The amended part 1) 5th part of the first instance judgment (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) 1st part (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) 2. The same side / [based on recognition] / her appraiser / her “this court” and “the court of first instance” respectively / her “the appraiser of the first instance trial” and “the court of first instance. 2) The “C’s claim against the Plaintiff” of the seventh part of the first instance judgment 7th part of the first instance judgment is deemed to be “the Plaintiff’s claim against C”.

3) The part of the first instance court’s 11 through 5’s 11’s 11’s 3 through 5’s 17’s 17’s 1,10,000 won is “1,10,000 won,” and the part of the 6’s 11’s 6th 7th 7th 7th 7th 380,063,365’s 40,063,365, each of the “3,” and each of the “380,063,365 won” as “40,063,63,365 won,” and each of the “1’s 11th 11,88, and 9’s 19th 7th 7th 7th 19’s 1’s 1’s 1’s 1’s 1’s 1’s 3’s 1’s 3’s 3’ 1’s 1’s m 1’the 1’s 1’s m 1’.

5 The "amount of secured claim" of the 11th judgment of the first instance court is the "amount of secured claim", and the "amount of secured claim" of the 14th judgment is different from the "amount of secured claim".

2. Additional matters to be determined;

(a) Claim 1 in the amount of compensation for value cited by a party member; and

(b)as described in paragraph 3,