When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 09:20 on January 4, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the face of E at least 2-3 times on the front side of the D in Pakistan.

On January 4, 2015, when receiving the report of 112 as the above assault case, the defendant was arrested the defendant as a flagrant offender at around 09:35, a slope G belonging to the police station of Pakistan, who was dispatched to the site after receiving the report of 112, and then sent the defendant at around 09:35, and the defendant stated that the above G was able to take a bath, i.e., "Woo kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb k in the face of the victim by hand

Accordingly, the defendant jointly with H interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of a fine, the selection of a fine [the amount of a fine shall be determined after taking into account all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is relatively old and against his/her age, especially the fact that the damaged police officer wants the defendant's seat, the degree of violence, motive and circumstance of the crime, and the degree of participation];

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the gist of the facts charged in this part of the indictment concerning the dismissal of prosecution pursuant to the order of provisional payment is as follows: (a) assaulting the victim’s face at 2-3 times on the ground that the defendant, around January 4, 2015, 09:20, at the front of the D located in Pakistan-si, was frightd with the victim E (the age of 19).

This is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Code and cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim in accordance with paragraph (3) of the same Article.

However, the records are examined.