2. In full view of the arguments in the instant case and the reasons for sentencing indicated in the record, the lower court’s sentencing on the Defendant appears to have been appropriately determined by fully taking into account all the circumstances, including the various reasons for sentencing alleged by the Defendant, and the mere fact that the Defendant led to the confession of the facts charged in the instant case in the trial is difficult to view the lower court’s punishment as

3. In conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit and is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Provided, That pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, ex officio, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed, and the Defendant’s appeal is subject to Article 40, Article 50 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and Article 50 of the Criminal Procedure Act, as between the two acts, “1. 7, and 8.”

1. He shall be corrected to add a “elective fine” to that of a penalty;